Avoid Erroneous Test Results
Not all Paternity Testing is the
Same
Most people assume that all DNA paternity tests are the
same, and it doesn’t matter where you get your DNA test done. That could not
be farther from the truth.
Even if you are using an accredited DNA paternity testing laboratory, the
minimum required levels of paternity testing are very low. DNA paternity
testing laboratories know that if they only test DNA to the minimum required
level, a number of paternity test results every year will identify someone
as the biological father when he is not (a “false inclusion”) or say that he
is not the biological father when he actually is (a “false exclusion”).
The DNA paternity testing industry is regulated by the American Association
of Blood Banks (AABB). The two committees at the AABB that actually
establish the requirements for DNA paternity testing are composed of
volunteers from private DNA paternity testing laboratories like Paternity
Testing Corporation. Historically, those committees have made certain that
DNA paternity testing laboratories are following correct scientific
procedure, but they have been less concerned about the amount of paternity
testing that DNA paternity testing laboratories perform. The theory is that
if a client wants additional DNA testing, the client can negotiate with the
paternity testing laboratory to pay for additional DNA testing. The problem
is that clients have no way to know if they need more DNA testing.
So Paternity Testing Corporation provides the extra DNA testing
automatically, at no extra charge. We are simply unwilling to release a DNA
paternity test that we believe has any realistic chance of being incorrect.
It is surprising that many DNA paternity testing laboratories do not feel
that way. A Miami paper wrote a very interesting story that interviewed
several DNA testing laboratories and demonstrates the wide variety of
opinions regarding additional DNA testing.
Click here to read article
Clients who have received DNA paternity tests from other DNA paternity
testing laboratories, but question the results, sometimes send them to
Paternity Testing Corporation for review. We have received many such DNA
paternity tests. The vast majority of those DNA tests have correctly
identified the tested man as the biological father or not. But some of those
DNA paternity tests have reached an incorrect conclusion. In those cases, if
the client asks Paternity Testing Corporation to perform the DNA paternity
test on the same parties, we have been able to obtain the correct DNA
paternity test result, explain to the client the reason that the other DNA
testing laboratory obtained a wrong answer and are usually able to get the
other DNA testing laboratory to correct their error and issue a corrected
DNA paternity test report.
The problem is that in some of the cases of incorrect DNA paternity test
results, the clients do not realize that their original DNA paternity test
was wrong. Many live out the rest of their lives assuming that the DNA
paternity test has provided a correct answer.
Some of the things that cause incorrect DNA paternity tests are discussed
below.
False Inclusions of a DNA paternity test
A DNA paternity test works by identifying certain specific size pieces of
DNA that the child received from the child’s biological father. If the DNA
tested man has those same size pieces, then he could be the child’s
biological father. But other men in the population will also have those same
size pieces. So a DNA paternity testing laboratory tests additional DNA
locations (genetic markers). In general, the more DNA locations that are
tested, the more rare the total pattern will be. In other words, fewer other
men will also have this pattern. The more rare the pattern is, the more
likely it will be that the DNA tested man is truly the child’s biological
father.
However, if DNA testing is stopped after identifying only a pattern that is
somewhat common, then there is a greater chance that the DNA tested man is
not the biological father, but is just one of the people in the population
with this same somewhat common pattern. Thus, sometimes DNA paternity tests
are incorrect because they have falsely included the DNA tested man as the
biological father, when he is not. Those tests are not “technically
incorrect,” as the laboratories issuing them will tell you, because the
result just states a probability that the tested man is the biological
father, and not a certainty. But the test has identified the wrong man as
dad, and the DNA tested parties would therefore consider the test result to
be incorrect. At Paternity Testing Corporation we certainly agree.
Those DNA paternity testing laboratories that are more conscientious insist
on continuing DNA testing until they achieve a pattern that is more rare
than the required minimum level, and therefore provide a more reliable DNA
paternity test. The industry only requires DNA testing until a 99%
probability of paternity is achieved. But at that level of DNA testing, the
identified DNA pattern would be possessed, on average, by one in every 100
men, and in some cases will be even much more common than that. At that
level, there are still many men who would fit that pattern and who the DNA
test would show to be the child’s biological father. Some DNA paternity
testing laboratories insist on DNA testing until they achieve at least a
99.9% probability of paternity, which is a pattern that on average fits one
in every 1,000 men. Paternity Testing Corporation insists on testing until
we achieve at least a 99.99% probability of paternity, which is a pattern
that on average fits only one in every 10,000 men.
The following graph gives you a very understated idea
of the difference in the minimum level of discrimination in tests from
various laboratories.

False Exclusions
DNA Paternity tests can falsely exclude someone who is
truly the child’s biological father for a variety of reasons.
One major reason is simple human error. For example, it is possible at the
time of the DNA specimen collection for the collector to accidentally place
the child’s DNA specimen in the mother’s DNA specimen envelope and the
mother’s DNA specimen in the DNA child’s envelope. This type of sample
switch causes the DNA paternity testing laboratory to compare the alleged
father’s DNA to the mother’s DNA, instead of to the child’s DNA. This has
caused paternity testing laboratories to issue a paternity report that
excludes the alleged father even though he is the biological father, because
the samples were switched. Paternity Testing Corporation puts a simple check
in place which requires that for every test that appears to be an exclusion,
we compare the alleged father’s DNA to the mother’s DNA, and if they match
at all DNA locations, then we look into it further and correct any sample
switch before we complete the DNA paternity test.
Another type of human error that has caused erroneous test results is the
situation where the alleged father sent in an imposter (someone pretending
to be the alleged father to provide a DNA sample). Sometimes this can go
undetected if the mother is not able to identify the picture of the alleged
father or was not present at the collection, but when it is detected, the
alleged father is forced to go in himself and give a DNA sample. Sometimes
the DNA paternity testing laboratory has accidentally reused the original
sample and DNA tested the leftover portion of it instead of the new sample
(because the original DNA sample still had the name of the alleged father on
it). At Paternity Testing Corporation we implement many additional
procedures that are not required by the AABB, simply to minimize the
possibility of human error.
False exclusions can also result from an inadequate amount of DNA testing.
One way this occurs is by assuming that the DNA tested man is not the father
just because his DNA fails to match the child’s DNA at two DNA locations.
Quite often the child’s DNA mutates, so that the child's DNA and father's
DNA do not match at one or a few DNA locations, even though the man really
is the child’s biological father. Occasionally there can be two DNA
locations where the child and biological father do not match, and extremely
rarely the biological father can fail to match the child at three locations.
The AABB’s minimum testing requirement is that the laboratory has to find at
least two locations where they do not match, in order to issue a report
excluding the alleged father. The theory is that mutations are pretty rare,
so if there are two DNA locations that don’t match, then probably they are
not mutations.
But DNA paternity testing laboratories realize that sometimes the two
non-matching locations will both be mutations, and the man will actually be
the biological father. Paternity Testing Corporation tracks these events. In
our experience, over half the time that the tested man and child fail to
match at only two locations out of fifteen, additional testing proves that
the man is actually the biological father. As a result, at Paternity Testing
Corporation we require stronger DNA testing. Paternity Testing Corporation’s
laboratory policy is to continue DNA testing until we either prove that the
tested man is the biological father, or find at least four DNA locations
where the man and child do not match. Some laboratories simply issue a DNA
paternity test excluding the tested man after finding two non-matching
locations, even though they are aware that a reasonable amount of additional
testing could change the outcome of the DNA paternity test.
One example of this problem occurred a few years ago, when Paternity Testing
Corporation received an angry call from the Miami Family Court. The man in
this case wanted to establish that he was the child’s biological father, and
the man wanted to be involved in the child’s life. Paternity Testing
Corporation had shown that the man was the father. The judge wanted to know
how two different DNA paternity testing laboratories could have issued DNA
paternity tests with two different results for the same family. The answer
was that the other laboratory had issued a test excluding the alleged father
after finding only two locations where the man and child did not match. When
this discrepancy was brought to the other DNA Paternity testing laboratory’s
attention, they performed additional DNA testing and issued a new laboratory
report agreeing that the man was the child’s biological father. A Miami
paper wrote a very interesting story about this case.
Click here to read article
DNA paternity testing laboratories performing only the minimum required
amount of DNA testing know that they will sometimes be issuing incorrect
paternity tests. At Paternity Testing Corporation we implement additional
DNA testing requirements and procedures to try to make sure that this does
not happen to you.
|